{"id":10215,"date":"2011-04-28T00:01:24","date_gmt":"2011-04-27T14:01:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/?p=10215"},"modified":"2021-04-15T10:15:26","modified_gmt":"2021-04-15T00:15:26","slug":"fofa-verdict-risk-commissions-to-continue-but-not-in-super-opt-in-every-2-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2011\/04\/28\/fofa-verdict-risk-commissions-to-continue-but-not-in-super-opt-in-every-2-years\/","title":{"rendered":"FoFA Verdict &#8211; Risk Commissions to Continue, But Not in Super; Opt-in Every 2 Years"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A\u00a0reprieve on risk commissions outside super,\u00a0client opt-in every two years and the introduction of a new form of advice \u00a0headline the new elements of the Government&#8217;s\u00a0Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms, announced overnight.<\/p>\n<p>Following a year-long debate and consultation period for reforms intended to &#8216;&#8230; ensure more Australians have access to high quality and affordable advice&#8217;, the new\u00a0FoFA reforms include:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A prospective ban on up-front and trailing commissions\u00a0for both individual and group risk products within superannuation from 1 July 2013 (but risk commissions outside super will continue)<\/li>\n<li>A prospective requirement for advisers to get clients to opt-in (renew) their advice agreement every two years from 1 July 2012<\/li>\n<li>A prospective ban on any form of payment relating to volume or sales targets from any financial services business to dealer groups, authorised representatives or advisers<\/li>\n<li>A prospective ban on soft dollar benefits from 1 July 2012<\/li>\n<li>Expanding a new form of limited advice called scaled advice, which can be provided by a range of advice providers<\/li>\n<li>Further investigation as to whether\u00a0the term \u2018financial planner\/adviser&#8217; should be restricted under the Corporations Act<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Risk Commissions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Up-front and trailing commissions for both individual and group risk advice within superannuation will be banned from 1 July 2013.<\/p>\n<p>Part of the\u00a0Government&#8217;s rationale is that &#8220;Fees and charges within superannuation come at the cost of foregone retirement savings and expenditure on insurance is tax deductible to the fund.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Government also notes the results of\u00a0ASIC shadow shopping surveys\u00a0that illustrate\u00a0&#8220;&#8230; in\u00a0case[s] of poor advice, over half involved poor life insurance advice.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The ban on conflicted remuneration does not extend to risk insurance outside super, i.e. retail risk commissions may continue.<\/p>\n<p>The benefits for this outcome,\u00a0cited in the Government&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/files\/2011\/04\/110428-fofa-announcement-vfinal.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">FoFA information pack<\/a>, include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The quality of advice will improve as conflicted remuneration structures will be removed<\/li>\n<li>Consumers will have the freedom to pay for insurance advice, but won&#8217;t be charged for services they don&#8217;t receive<\/li>\n<li>Accessing insurance through superannuation will remain attractive as preferential tax arrangements will remain<\/li>\n<li>Those consumers who want alternative payment arrangements have the choice and flexibility of doing so outside the superannuation environment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The Government notes it will continue to pursue client best interest issues in relation to policy churning.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Opt-in<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Retail clients will have to agree, by opting in,\u00a0to ongoing advice fees every two years from 1 July 2012.<\/p>\n<p>This will be supplemented by an intervening annual disclosure notice to be provided to the client detailing fee and service information for the previous and forthcoming year.<\/p>\n<p>The Government notes &#8220;A two-year opt-in means advisers are in regular contact with clients, but provides some flexibility regarding implementation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Implementation details include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The adviser being required to send a prescribed renewal notice no less than 30 days prior to the relevant (two year) anniversary date<\/li>\n<li>This notice would outline the fee the client paid in the previous year and a description of the services they received as well as fee and service information for the forthcoming year (also alerting the client to the fact that they can opt out at any time)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If the client does not respond to the notice or opts out, the adviser cannot continue to charge an ongoing advice fee.<\/p>\n<p>Answering the question asked by\u00a0many advisers over the last twelve months about when their liability for advice ceases when a client opts out, the Government states that:<\/p>\n<p><em>If a client does not respond to a renewal notice, they are taken to have chosen to opt-out 30 days after the anniversary date, meaning the adviser&#8217;s liability for ongoing advice ceases at the point that they can no longer charge an ongoing fee<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Banning Volume Payments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Government advises:<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;if structural reform in the industry is to truly transpire, all conflicted remuneration, including volume rebates from platform providers to dealer groups, must cease.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>One of the intended benefits of this ban on volume payments stated by the Government is that it will enhance competition with platforms competing with one another purely on price and quality for the client.<\/p>\n<p>The scope of this ban includes any volume-based shelf-space fees which are paid from the fund manager to the platform provider and from the platform provider to the licensee.<\/p>\n<p>However, the Government notes this ban does not apply to &#8216;pure risk insurance&#8217;, nor do intended bans on\u00a0soft dollar benefits apply to risk insurance outside superannuation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best Interests Duty<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Government says it recognises that the focus of the best interest duty should be on how a person has acted in providing advice rather than the outcome of that action. It also notes the duty should not be interpreted as imposing trustee-style obligations on financial advisers given the differences in roles between a trustee and a financial adviser.<\/p>\n<p>Further, the Government says compliance with this duty will be measured according to what is reasonable in the circumstances in which the advice is provided. If the client&#8217;s needs indicate that only limited advice is necessary, the adviser is not obliged to provide holistic advice.<\/p>\n<p>The Government also stipulates that any financial liability applied as a result of a breach in Statutory Best Interest Duty will be borne by the &#8216;relevant providing entity&#8217;, which mostly means the dealer group licensee.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Introduction of Scaled Advice<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Scaled advice&#8217; is a term initiated to describe &#8216;&#8230; advice about one area of an investor&#8217;s needs, such as insurance, or about a limited range of issues.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The Government&#8217;s motivation to introduce scaled advice is based on ASIC research that indicated many Australians, particularly those who have never previously accessed financial advice, want piece-by-piece simple advice rather than a complete financial plan.<\/p>\n<p>Intended to create\u00a0a level playing field for all advice providers, scaled advice will be able to be offered by:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Superannuation trustees (intra-fund advice is a form of scaled advice)<\/li>\n<li>Financial planners<\/li>\n<li>Accountants (to be confirmed)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The Government says the creation of a scaled advice structure &#8220;&#8230; will also open up new growth opportunities for advice professionals by removing the regulatory barriers to the provision of advice for those with simpler needs, including younger investors.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A consultation paper, dealing with issues surrounding how scaled advice may be provided, will be released mid year.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Restriction of the Term Financial Planner\/Adviser<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In considering this issue, the Government is weighing up the argument that on the one hand restricting the use of the term financial planner\/adviser will lead to certain consumer protection benefits against concerns it may, on the other hand,\u00a0create a regulatory barrier to entry and unnecessarily increase the cost of advice.<\/p>\n<p>The Treasury will shortly be providing its recommendation to the Government on this issue.<\/p>\n<p>Work on other aspects of the FoFA reforms is continuing, with draft legislation expected to be\u00a0released\u00a0for public comment shortly after the middle of this year, prior to final legislation\u00a0being introduced into Parliament later this year.<\/p>\n<p>In positioning\u00a0these reforms, Financial Services Minister <strong>Bill Shorten<\/strong> said:<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;With around 1 in 5 Australians currently receiving advice, the public policy and industry challenge is to ensure more Australians have access to high quality and affordable advice, particularly as we enjoy the gift of longer life. There is little doubt that those who access quality financial advice are better off than those who do not.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>In recognition of this, the FOFA reforms focus on improving the quality of financial advice and expanding the availability of more affordable forms of advice. The removal of regulatory barriers to the provision of different forms of advice will open up new markets for financial planners, helping them reach younger customers and those with less complex advice needs.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/files\/2011\/04\/110428-fofa-announcement-vfinal.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Click here<\/a>\u00a0to access your copy of the Government&#8217;s 2011 FoFA information pack.<\/p>\n<p>To view the response from the Federal Opposition, see: <a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2011\/04\/28\/fofa-ii-full-of-red-tape-federal-opposition\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"noopener\">FoFA II Full of Red Tape<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Industry Response<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">AFA<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The initial response from the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) is that while it supports the intent of the FoFA reforms it disagrees with how a number of them are intended to\u00a0be implemented.\u00a0 In this regard it says\u00a0&#8216;&#8230; consumers have been hung out to dry.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>According to AFA CEO, <strong>Richard Klipin<\/strong>, the AFA believes the new FoFA measures announced will mean that key financial advice for consumers in future will be:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Harder to access<\/li>\n<li>More expensive<\/li>\n<li>Filled with red tape<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In reference to the intention to ban all conflicted remuneration structures inside super but allow risk commissions outside super, Mr Klipin believes the notion of a taxation structure (where insurance premiums inside super are generally tax deductible) driving a remuneration model delivers benefits to no-one and will instead only further exacerbate the existing underinsurance crisis.<\/p>\n<p>On areas such as\u00a0opt-in and scaled advice Mr Klipin says the devil will be in the detail of the implementation.<\/p>\n<p>On a broader note, Mr Klipin contends the life insurance sector has been caught up in a series of regulatory changes inspired by events in which it had no role.\u00a0 He questions whether the unintended consequences associated with the implementation of the FoFA reforms are consistent with the Government&#8217;s stated\u00a0position of making \u00a0evidence-based policy decisions based on quality research and consultation.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">FPA<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Financial Planning Association (FPA) says a detailed examination of the reforms is required to understand how the package will deliver improved outcomes for consumers and FPA members.<\/p>\n<p>The FPA is specifically concerned about banning risk insurance commissions inside superannuation and legislating opt-in by clients every two years, and will continue its consultation with Government on these key aspects of the FoFA package.<\/p>\n<p>However, FPA CEO, <strong>Mark Rantall<\/strong>, said the decision to look at amending the original proposal with regards to the expansion of intra-fund advice and the best interests duty, will apply welcome consumer protection measures in a consistent manner across the industry.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The FPA has long been calling for further initiatives to improve access and affordability of financial advice to more Australians and supports the announcement to adopt a uniform and consistent approach so that all financial planners have the ability to provide scalable advice to more Australians,&#8221; Mr Rantall said.<\/p>\n<p>To view a summary of other industry body responses to the reforms, <a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2011\/04\/28\/industry-response-to-fofa\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"noopener\">click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A\u00a0reprieve on risk commissions outside super,\u00a0client opt-in every two years and the introduction of a new form of advice \u00a0headline the new elements of the Government&#8217;s\u00a0Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms, announced overnight. Following a year-long debate and consultation period for reforms intended to &#8216;&#8230; ensure more Australians have access to high quality and affordable [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,3,270],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-compliance-regulation","category-general","category-remuneration"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10215\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}