{"id":31879,"date":"2015-12-08T20:43:53","date_gmt":"2015-12-08T10:43:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/?p=31879"},"modified":"2015-12-09T07:42:23","modified_gmt":"2015-12-08T21:42:23","slug":"lif-legislation-shows-asic-will-shape-future-of-commissions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2015\/12\/08\/lif-legislation-shows-asic-will-shape-future-of-commissions\/","title":{"rendered":"LIF Outcomes to be Decided in 2018 ASIC Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While the life insurance sector has been given three years to transition to the Life Insurance Framework (LIF), it may only have the next two years in which to demonstrate the reforms are actually reducing churn-related behaviour.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_31548\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-31548\" style=\"width: 150px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/files\/2015\/11\/Kelly-ODwyer.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-31548\" alt=\"Assistant Treasurer, Kelly O'Dwyer\" src=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/files\/2015\/11\/Kelly-ODwyer.jpg\" width=\"150\" height=\"180\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-31548\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Assistant Treasurer, Kelly O&#8217;Dwyer<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>According to recent statements made by Assistant Treasurer, <strong>Kelly O\u2019Dwyer<\/strong>, the Government will determine its position on the future of adviser remuneration in 2018, a full year before the end of the LIF transition period, when it conducts a review into the impact of the reforms.<\/p>\n<p>This review will be informed by reporting the Government will receive from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) on trends in life policy lapses and retention levels following the commencement of the transition period from 1 July 2016.<\/p>\n<p>In releasing the draft legislation on 3 December, O\u2019Dwyer stated that \u201cASIC will undertake a review of the reforms in 2018 and that if this review does not identify significant improvement the Government will move to mandate level commissions, as recommended in the Murray Inquiry report\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>These comments are consistent with those made during the <a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2015\/10\/20\/level-commissions-loom-if-lif-fails-to-create-change\/\">Government\u2019s response to the Financial System Inquiry <\/a>in late October and when announcing <a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2015\/11\/06\/clawback-reduced-to-two-years\/\">the reduction of clawback from three-years to two-years<\/a> in early November, and are also included in the Explanatory Memorandum to the Draft Legislation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ASIC to Control Commission Flows<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An examination of the Explanatory Memorandum to the draft legislation indicates that ASIC will not only have a role in reviewing the sector but in controlling the flow of upfront, ongoing and level commissions to advisers.<\/p>\n<p>This will happen as the LIF legislation &#8211; titled the\u00a0<em>Corporations Amendment (Life Insurance Remuneration Arrangements) Bill 2015<\/em>\u00a0&#8211; will effectively remove the exemption to the ban on conflicted remuneration for benefits paid in relation to certain life risk insurance products, that is commissions and volume based payments.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time the Bill will amend the <em>Corporations Act 2001<\/em> to give ASIC the power to specify, via a legislative instrument:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the criteria under with life insurance products would be exempt from the ban on conflicted remuneration<\/li>\n<li>the maximum level of upfront and ongoing commission an adviser would receive<\/li>\n<li>the level of clawback where applicable<\/li>\n<li>the payment of level commissions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Churn Under LIF Already Defined by ASIC<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In terms of gathering data for a 2018 review ASIC is already empowered under the Corporations Act to be able to request data on a regular basis from financial services licensees and is likely to take a similar stance on lapse and churn as it did during the creation of <em>Report 413: Review of retail life insurance advice<\/em> last year.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking at an Australian Risk Advisers\/riskinfo Professional Development Day in September, \u00a0ASIC Senior Executive Leader &#8211; Financial Advisers, <strong>Louise Macaulay<\/strong> said the regulator was focused on the best interest of a client when considering if an insurance policy had been churned.<\/p>\n<h6>&#8220;&#8230;We have got quite a blunt definition of churn in the sense we are looking for when it is not in the best interest of a client&#8230;&#8221;<\/h6>\n<p>\u201cFrom our perspective when we see a client moved into a new insurance policy and it is not in their best interest then we think that is a problem, and the colloquial reference to it is churn. In our report that we did on life insurance we did not use the word churn but we talked about situations where it was not in the best interests of the client to be put into a new policy,\u201d Macaulay said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI understand there are issues around lapse and it is difficult to define that, but we have got quite a blunt definition of churn in the sense we are looking for when it is not in the best interest of a client. There can be a grey area when moving a client to a new policy and whether it is or isn\u2019t in their best interest but we are way over on the side where it clearly is not in their best interest.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While the life insurance sector has been given three years to transition to the Life Insurance Framework (LIF), it may only have the next two years in which to demonstrate the reforms are actually reducing churn-related behaviour.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":31912,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,270],"tags":[4247],"class_list":["post-31879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-compliance-regulation","category-remuneration","tag-feature"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31879\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31912"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}