{"id":45885,"date":"2019-08-08T12:51:07","date_gmt":"2019-08-08T02:51:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/?p=45885"},"modified":"2019-08-08T13:16:29","modified_gmt":"2019-08-08T03:16:29","slug":"fasea-confirms-90-advisers-pass-first-exam-series","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2019\/08\/08\/fasea-confirms-90-advisers-pass-first-exam-series\/","title":{"rendered":"FASEA Confirms 90%+ Advisers Pass First Exam Series"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>FASEA has released details of the results of the June 2019 round of the FASEA adviser examination, in which more than 90 percent of advisers passed the exam.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In what it referred to as result highlights from the initial exam series, a release by FASEA this afternoon noted:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The exam was held in nine centres across Australia from 20 June to 24 June<\/li>\n<li>579 advisers sat the exam<\/li>\n<li>Over 90 percent of candidates passed the exam<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The Authority advised the exam was subject to ACER\u2019s comprehensive marking approach and is marked to credit standard, but where the pass rate will vary with each exam.<\/p>\n<p>FASEA Chief Executive Officer, <strong>Stephen Glenfield<\/strong>, said: \u201cFASEA is pleased with the implementation of the first exam and congratulates successful candidates on completing an important component of their education requirements under the Corporations Act.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Glenfield added that unsuccessful candidates are able to re-sit the exam and these advisers will receive guidance on which knowledge areas they need to improve to enhance their ability to pass at a future sitting.<\/p>\n<p>FASEA also stated it has received more than 1,000 enrollments for its September and December 2019 sittings.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>FASEA has released details of the results of the June 2019 round of the FASEA adviser examination, in which more than 90 percent of advisers passed the exam.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-compliance-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45885\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}