{"id":54308,"date":"2021-02-23T11:13:28","date_gmt":"2021-02-23T01:13:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/?p=54308"},"modified":"2024-10-30T08:45:20","modified_gmt":"2024-10-29T22:45:20","slug":"poll-results-80-20-works","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2021\/02\/23\/poll-results-80-20-works\/","title":{"rendered":"Poll Results &#8211; 80\/20 Works"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"polls-248\" class=\"wp-polls\">\n\t\t<div class=\"pollHeader\"><strong>An 80\/20 risk commission model will sustain a viable risk-focussed advice business, but a 60\/20 model will not.<\/strong><\/div><div id=\"polls-248-ans\" class=\"wp-polls-ans\"><ul class=\"wp-polls-ul\">\n\t\t<li>Agree <small>(90%)<\/small><div class=\"pollbar\" style=\"width: 90%\" title=\"Agree (90% | 278 Votes)\"><\/div><\/li>\n\t\t<li>Disagree <small>(6%)<\/small><div class=\"pollbar\" style=\"width: 6%\" title=\"Disagree (6% | 19 Votes)\"><\/div><\/li>\n\t\t<li>Not sure <small>(4%)<\/small><div class=\"pollbar\" style=\"width: 4%\" title=\"Not sure (4% | 12 Votes)\"><\/div><\/li>\n\t\t<\/ul><div style=\"text-align: center\"><\/div><\/div>\n\t\t<input type=\"hidden\" id=\"poll_248_nonce\" name=\"wp-polls-nonce\" value=\"99bb711076\" \/>\n<\/div>\n\n<p>Advisers have sent a clear message on what they think is needed to successfully operate a risk specialist advice business.<\/p>\n<p>As we go to press, nine in ten of those taking our latest poll (89%) agree that an 80\/20 hybrid commission model for life insurance advice can form the basis for a sustainable risk-focussed advice business, whereas the current 60\/20 model cannot.<\/p>\n<p>This is a strong outcome, which seems to make commercial sense. It reflects the fact that prior to the introduction of the Life Insurance Framework reforms, the 80\/20 hybrid commission model was a standard commercial offer made by all insurers and was a model which was increasing in its popularity. However, insurers never offered a 60\/20 model because the numbers didn&#8217;t add up for advisers from a commercial perspective (nor do the numbers add up for some advisers at 80\/20).<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>While &#8230;the high upfront\u00a0 commission era will not return, debate remains about the future of risk commissions<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>While it seems to be universally accepted that the high upfront commission era will not return, debate remains about the future of risk commissions.<\/p>\n<p>One factor we didn&#8217;t address last week was the issue of the two-year clawback period currently mandated under the Life Insurance Framework reforms, which sits alongside the current 60\/20 cap. One possible alternative future remuneration scenario involves the proposition that under an 80\/20 hybrid model, any replacement business would attract level commission only, but this restriction would be accompanied by a reduction in the current two-year clawback period to one year.<\/p>\n<p>This is just one example of a number of potential future commission-based remuneration models for life insurance advice. However, we appreciate many advisers would not support this alternative scenario outlined above and we&#8217;re also mindful that any such debate is entirely theoretical, given the current LIF commission cap and clawback restrictions that now apply.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, we will welcome your thoughts about the future for specialist risk advice businesses as our poll remains open for another week&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Advisers have sent a clear message on what they think is needed to successfully operate a risk specialist advice business. As we go to press, nine in ten of those taking our latest poll (89%) agree that an 80\/20 hybrid commission model for life insurance advice can form the basis for a sustainable risk-focussed advice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":54332,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,49,270],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-54308","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-compliance-regulation","8":"category-polls","9":"category-remuneration"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54308\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}