{"id":5837,"date":"2010-04-28T07:29:13","date_gmt":"2010-04-27T20:29:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/?p=5837"},"modified":"2020-02-06T08:09:38","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T21:09:38","slug":"adviserindustry-response-to-government-reform-package","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2010\/04\/28\/adviserindustry-response-to-government-reform-package\/","title":{"rendered":"Adviser\/Industry Response to Government Reform Package"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There has been swift and varied reaction from the financial services\u00a0sector following the release\u00a0of the Federal Government&#8217;s\u00a0<em>Future of Financial Advice<\/em> reform package earlier this week, which included the intention to ban commissions from 1 July 2012 (see <a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2010\/04\/26\/government-bans-commissions-risk-not-included-yet\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Government Bans Commissions&#8230;<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>We have summarised\u00a0a range of responses from product manufacturers, associations and individual advisers:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>Product Manufacturers<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The two most prominent advocates of the move to fee for service have been MLC and AMP, and it has been these two organisation who have been first to release their response:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">MLC<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson representing MLC &amp; NAB Wealth has commented:<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;We welcome Minister Bowen&#8217;s proposed reform agenda which we believe will help drive greater trust in the financial advice profession. It addresses a number of the core issues that have been holding the reputation of the industry back including commissions and volume based payments&#8230;&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">AMP<\/span><\/p>\n<p>AMP Financial Services Managing Director, <strong>Craig Meller<\/strong>, said AMP is supportive of the Government&#8217;s steps to increase consumer confidence in the financial services industry:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<em>&#8220;As an industry we need to ensure Australians have confidence in the quality of the advice they receive and that it is delivered as efficiently and cost effectively as possible,&#8221;<\/em>said Mr Meller.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Associations<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Associations representing financial institutions have issued statements strongly supporting the Future of Financial Advice reforms, while associations representing financial advisers have offered qualified support for some of the reform initiatives:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">IFSA<\/span><\/p>\n<p>IFSA CEO, <strong>John Brogden<\/strong>, commented, <em>&#8220;&#8230; the Federal Government&#8217;s announcement on reforms to financial advice is a win for consumers and will build trust between financial advisers and the community.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;Our objective is to create a financial services industry where advice is transparent, of the highest quality and available to all Australians. This package, in addition to industry initiatives to enhance customer control and ban commissions on superannuation, will substantially achieve these outcomes,&#8221;<\/em>said Mr Brogden.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">ASFA<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia believes Superannuation fund members will get better access to advice about their retirement as a result of the reform measures announced by the Federal Government.<\/p>\n<p>ASFA CEO, <strong>Pauline Vamos<\/strong>: <em>&#8220;The Government&#8217;s response recognises the importance of delivering single\/limited issue, cost-effective objective advisory services particularly in the superannuation and retirement area.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">FPA<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The FPA offered qualified support, welcoming &#8216;&#8230; a number of reforms&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>Acting FPA CEO, <strong>Deen Sanders<\/strong>, said these reforms would play an instrumental role in improving transparency and investor protection in the financial planning industry, adding these reforms represent the most significant changes to financial planning since the Financial Services Reform Act in 2003:<\/p>\n<h6>there will be positive and negative impacts on the advice industry&#8230;<\/h6>\n<p><em>&#8220;Given the scale of the reform package, there will be positive and negative impacts on the advice industry, so implementation will take time and require careful consideration,&#8221;<\/em> said Mr Sanders.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">AFA<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The AFA also welcomed the release of the Government&#8217;s reform measures, saying the broad thrust of the Government&#8217;s response is sensible, but adding it has major concerns in a number of key areas, including adviser and consumer choice over remuneration:<\/p>\n<p><em>The AFA has argued consistently that consumers require choice:<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Choice of adviser (aligned, tied, independent, salaried)<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Choice of advice (holistic or specific)<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Choice in the price they pay (the way and the value they derive)<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Choice of pricing model (fees\/commissions\/hourly rates)<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>AFA President, <strong>Jim Taggart<\/strong>, said that in banning commissions the Government not only denies consumers the fundamental right to choose how they pay for advice, but goes one step further and dictates how they remunerate their advisers:<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;It is a major concern that in a free market, the Government should consider it necessary to legislate how any professional in any industry should be remunerated,&#8221; he said. &#8220;What we are seeing is disempowerment of the individual,&#8221;<\/em>said Mr Taggart.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">Adviser Comments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Taken from comments made by advisers to our <a href=\"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/2010\/04\/26\/government-bans-commissions-risk-not-included-yet\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">initial story<\/a> on the Future of Financial Advice Reforms, with or thanks:<\/p>\n<p><em>We are merely following the lead of some other countries, and seeing the demise of the finance industry<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The product groups &#8230; will be rubbing their hands with glee at this announcement. Less competition, less independence of advice and fiduciary responsibilities moved onto the shoulders of their employee \u2018advisers&#8217;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>If all fees and charges are disclosed as required what is the problem. &#8230; Most clients can&#8217;t afford fee for service payments out of their hip pocket&#8230;<\/em>It <em>is the non discloser that is the problem not the name of the payment.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Without ongoing trail commissions, we will have no financial capacity to carry unprofitable clients so they will have to be culled. As is typically the case with misplaced government policy the consumer will be worse off as they will less choice, higher direct fees and advice will be out of reach for most.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>I can just see the annual &#8220;opt-in&#8221; fee being the catalyst that will cause advisers to form relationships only with the wealthier section of community.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8230;when someone walks into a [bank] branch or an industry fund office under the new regime and requests advice on where their money should be invested from a salaried employee, is there a chance in hell it will go anywhere other than into their own products? How is this creating a more level playing field&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The government decisions about banning commissions I still think are wrong as they are directing how we are to be paid and not giving the public a more affordable way for them to pay for advice.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There has been swift and varied reaction from the financial services\u00a0sector following the release\u00a0of the Federal Government&#8217;s\u00a0Future of Financial Advice reform package earlier this week, which included the intention to ban commissions from 1 July 2012 (see Government Bans Commissions&#8230;). We have summarised\u00a0a range of responses from product manufacturers, associations and individual advisers:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,270],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-5837","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-compliance-regulation","7":"category-remuneration"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5837","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5837"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5837\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/riskinfo.com.au\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}