Is Life Insurance Too Expensive?

3
Is Life Insurance in Australia Too Expensive?
  • Depends on type of product (51%)
  • Yes (28%)
  • No (21%)
  • Not sure (0%)

A simple question forms the basis of our latest adviser poll:

Is Life Insurance in Australia Too Expensive?

While the question is simple, determining the answer may not be as easy.  We had re-affirmed for us this week that the number one reason the main income earner in a household does not have life insurance is because it is too expensive (see: Life Insurance is Too Expensive – Consumers).  TAL tells us that the ‘too expensive’ reason (or excuse?) is the main driver for not taking out life cover – by a significant margin, followed by: not having any dependents to protect, and the belief that health insurance provides the same level of protection.

(As a side issue, will consumers view the soon-to-be-implemented National Disability Insurance Scheme as another reason not to secure life insurance cover appropriate to their needs?)

But back to our poll – do you think the cost of life insurance in Australia is literally too expensive for consumers?  Or do you think it is only perceived to be too expensive when, in reality, it is not?  Does this distinction even matter, when the end result is the same, ie: consumers aren’t buying?

The industry is presently engaging in a heightened debate on the issue of sustainability.  It is reported that policy lapse rates are heading north and that claims experience losses are increasing, particularly within the income protection market.  These trends combine to create an argument that life insurance premiums in Australia are, in fact, too low!

The question becomes more involved when taking into account the expanding variety of life insurance products that are being launched into the market, via multiple channels.  Some are ‘advised’, comprehensive, life insurance solutions, while others by-pass the adviser and are delivered direct to the end user, or via group insurance and industry funds.  This doesn’t mean that direct or group products are necessarily cheaper or offer better value, but it does highlight the growing variety of options available to the public.  Yet it seems that, while overall industry sales are still growing, a significant proportion of consumers are still resisting – mainly based on affordability issues.

How can/should this issue be addressed?  If ‘affordability’ is just a perception issue, then it seems the industry continues to be challenged by its long-time inability to truly engage with the mass market.  If pricing is indeed too high, how does the life insurance sector manage this issue at a time when there is upward pressure on premiums?

For the time being, tell us whether you believe consumers are paying too much for their life insurance coverage, or whether you think they are getting good value today for the premiums they pay…



3 COMMENTS

  1. Up to age 40, Insurance is well priced and affordable. Unfortunately once people hit their 40’s and 50’s, the premium increases for existing clients drives them away, as they compare what they used to pay and look at what they pay now and unless there is a urgent need, many policy holders will cancel.
    The Industry needs to find a way to try to even out premium increases so we do not lose loyal people who constantly tell us that stepped premium hikes are too much of a shock, let alone additional increases to cover losses that have been double digit premium rises in the past.

  2. We have to remember that perception is reality. If consumers perceive the cost to be to expensive, then it is, whether those within the industry agree or not. The marketing spin of advisers pushing largely irrelevant ancillary benefits just so they can push up premiums and make more commission has exacerbated the problem greatly. Take a look at the things people actually claim on, insure only those things, and don’t try to convince people they need things they don’t. Ancillary benefits are mostly just unneccesary marketing stuff.

  3. Too expensive.

    Age 54 this year. Last years premium for $1.1m life and $278k was $535 pm. Notification in Jan this year that the premium is now $616 pm a 15% increase.

    I have reviewed my cover periodically to try and reduce premiums and keep coming back to my two super funds, which when the premium for the equivalent cover is calculated on paper comes in at $220-280 pm. The problem with super cover is in the detail of the cover and the uncertainty about cover if I choose to stop working.

    Consequently I am stuck with the life insurers.

Comments are closed.